Viewer Submitted Openings Bonus 9 pgn

From TCEC wiki
Revision as of 05:53, 21 December 2019 by Aloril (talk | contribs) (Fix name of link)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

So far submitted openings for next VSOB10 at Viewer_Submitted_Openings_Bonus_10_pgn.


[Event "Viewer Submitted Openings Bonus 9"]
[Site "?"] 
[Date "?"] 
[Round "?"] 
[White "?"] 
[Black "?"] 
[Result "*"] 
[ECO "B06"] 
[Opening "Modern"]
[PlyCount "8"]

{Ove: The old main line. Many options for both sides}
1.e4 g6 2.d4 Bg7 3.Nc3 d6 4. f4 c6 *

[Event "Viewer Submitted Openings Bonus 9"]
[Site "?"] 
[Date "?"] 
[Round "?"] 
[White "?"] 
[Black "?"] 
[Result "*"] 
[ECO "B12"] 
[Opening "Caro-Kann"]
[Variation "Euwe Attack"] 
[PlyCount "3"]

{Ove: An odd side line}
1. e4 c6 2. b3 *

[Event "Viewer Submitted Openings Bonus 9"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "?"]
[Round "?"]
[White "?"]
[Black "?"]
[Result "*"]
[ECO "C18"]
[Opening "French"]
[Variation "Winaver"]
[PlyCount "21"]

{Plasticicon: Tal-Botvinnik, World Championship Match 1960, and also in the rematch 1961}
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 c5 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.bxc3 Qc7 7.Qg4 f5 8.Qg3 Ne7 9.Qxg7 Rg8 10.Qxh7 cxd4 11.Kd1 *

[Event "Viewer Submitted Openings Bonus 9"]
[Site "?"] 
[Date "?"] 
[Round "?"] 
[White "?"] 
[Black "?"] 
[Result "*"] 
[ECO "A81"] 
[Opening "Dutch"]
[PlyCount "6"]

{Ove: Many options for both sides}
1. d4 f5 2. g3 Nf6 3. Bg2 d6 *

[Event "Viewer Submitted Openings Bonus 9"]
[Site "?"] 
[Date "?"] 
[Round "?"] 
[White "?"] 
[Black "?"] 
[Result "*"] 
[ECO "C41"] 
[Opening "Philidor"]
[PlyCount "11"]

{Nordlandia: I discovered this not long ago. It shares many similarities with the the cochrane gambit, albeit slightly more dubious}
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 Nf6 4. Ng5 h6 5. Nxf7 Kxf7 6. dxe5 *

[Event "Viewer Submitted Openings Bonus 9"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "?"]
[Round "?"]
[White "?"]
[Black "?"]
[Result "*"]
[ECO "B00"]
[Opening "Nimzowitsch Defence"]
[Variation "2.d4 d5 3.e5 Bf5 4.c3"]
[PlyCount "26"]

{joules kin: a Nh8 :stuck_out_tongue: }
1. e4 Nc6 2. d4 d5 3. e5 Bf5 4. c3 f6 5. f4 e6 6. Nf3 Nh6 7. Bd3 Be7 8. O-O
O-O 9. Bxf5 Nxf5 10. g4 Nh6 11. h3 fxe5 12. fxe5 Nf7 13. Qd3 Nh8 *

[Event "Viewer Submitted Openings Bonus 9"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "?"]
[Round "?"]
[White "?"]
[Black "?"]
[Result "*"]
[ECO "B00"]
[Opening "Nimzowitsch Defence"]
[Variation "2.Nc3 e6"]
[PlyCount "18"]

{joules kin: just how stupid is black's setup?}
1. e4 Nc6 2. Nc3 e6 3. d3 d5 4. g3 d4 5. Nce2 e5 6. Bg2 h5 7. h3 h4 8. g4
g5 9. Nf3 f6 *

[Event "Viewer Submitted Openings Bonus 9"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "?"]
[Round "?"]
[White "?"]
[Black "?"]
[Result "*"]
[ECO "A01"]
[Opening "Nimzowitsch-Larsen Attack"]
[PlyCount "16"]

{joules kin: larsen attack vs brainless c6 d6 Qc7 setup}
1. b3 c6 2. Bb2 Qc7 3. Nf3 d6 4. d4 Bg4 5. e4 Nd7 6. h3 Bh5 7. Nbd2 e5 8.
Qe2 O-O-O *

[Event "Viewer Submitted Openings Bonus 9"]
[Site "?"] 
[Date "?"] 
[Round "?"] 
[White "?"] 
[Black "?"] 
[Result "*"] 
[ECO "B96"] 
[Opening "Sicilian"]
[Variation "Najdorf, Improved Stratagem"] 
[PlyCount "12"]

{Ove: Old move that has been revived }
1. e4 c5 2. d4 cxd4 3. Nf3 d6 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Bg5 Nbd7 *

[Event "Viewer Submitted Openings Bonus 9"]
[Site "?"] 
[Date "?"] 
[Round "?"] 
[White "?"] 
[Black "?"] 
[Result "*"] 
[ECO "B00"]
[Opening "Nimzowitsch Defence"]
[Variation "Colorado Counter"]
[PlyCount "18"]

{Lolligerhans: Wanna see how this is played out (more) accurately}
1. e4 Nc6 2. Nf3 f5 3. exf5 d5 4. d4 Bxf5 5. Bb5 e6 6. Ne5 Ne7 7. Qh5+ g6
8. Qe2 Bg7 9. Bg5 O-O *

[Event "Viewer Submitted Openings Bonus 9"]
[Site "?"] 
[Date "?"] 
[Round "?"] 
[White "?"] 
[Black "?"] 
[Result "*"] 
[ECO "B00"]
[Opening "Nimzowitsch Defence"]
[Variation "Colorado Counter"]
[PlyCount "13"]

{Lolligerhans: White deviates on move 7 in order to prevent fast Bg7. IIRC, SF didnt mind this but Leela says this shifts the advantage to the black player}
1. e4 Nc6 2. Nf3 f5 3. exf5 d5 4. d4 Bxf5 5. Bb5 e6 6. Ne5 Ne7 7. Qe2 *

[Event "Viewer Submitted Openings Bonus 9"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "?"]
[Round "?"]
[White "?"]
[Black "?"]
[Result "*"]
[ECO "A00"]
[Opening "Mieses opening"]
[Variation "Delayed Dutch"]
[PlyCount "3"]

{Lolligerhans:  Let's give the dutch an extra tempo!}
1. d3 f5 2. d4 *

[Event "Viewer Submitted Openings Bonus 9"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "?"]
[Round "?"]
[White "?"]
[Black "?"]
[Result "*"]
[ECO "A00"]
[Opening "Mieses opening"]
[Variation "Delayed Dutch"]
[PlyCount "7"]

{Lolligerhans:  Let's give the dutch as many tempos as needed!}
1. d3 f5 2. d4 Nf6 3. c3 g6 4. c4 *

[Event "Viewer Submitted Openings Bonus 9"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "?"]
[Round "?"]
[White "?"]
[Black "?"]
[Result "*"]
[ECO "D47"]
[Opening "Semi-Slav Defense"]
[Variation "Meran Variation, Wade Variation "]
[PlyCount "16"]

{atanh: Derived from ChessDB.cn top moves after 1. d4, circa 2019-12-04. According to Lichess and other sites, top continuations seem to be 9. O-O, and 9. e4, with 9. a3 underwhelmingly coming in third. However, while exploring CDBCN, it seems that 9. a3 might hold more promise than it first seems. Will be interesting to see what the latest engines think. }
1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Nf3 c6 5. e3 Nbd7 6. Bd3 dxc4 7. Bxc4 b5 8. Bd3 Bb7 *

[Event "Viewer Submitted Openings Bonus 9"]
[Site "?"] 
[Date "?"] 
[Round "?"] 
[White "?"] 
[Black "?"] 
[Result "*"] 
[ECO "C41"] 
[Opening "Philidor"]
[Variation "Hanham"] 
[PlyCount "14"]

{Ove: Solid line}
1. e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6 3. d4 Nf6 4. Nc3 Nbd7 5. Bc4 Be7 6. O-O O-O 7. a4 c6 *

[Event "Viewer Submitted Openings Bonus 9"]
[Site "?"] 
[Date "?"] 
[Round "?"] 
[White "?"] 
[Black "?"] 
[Result "*"] 
[ECO "C63"] 
[Opening "Spanish"]
[Variation "Jänisch"] 
[PlyCount "7"]

{Ove: A sound line}
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 f5 4. d3 *

[Event "Viewer Submitted Openings Bonus 9"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "?"]
[Round "?"]
[White "?"]
[Black "?"]
[Result "*"]
[ECO "C18"]
[Opening "French"]
[Variation "Winaver"]
[PlyCount "14"]

{BFPlayer1: 7...Kf8 is somewhat clumsy. Why not castle directly instead?}
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 c5 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.bxc3 Ne7 7.Qg4 Kf8 *

[Event "Viewer Submitted Openings Bonus 9"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2005.08.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "?"]
[Black "?"]
[Result "*"]
[ECO "C64"]
[PlyCount "14"]
[EventDate "2005.??.??"]

{Occyroexanthub: I like this bold variation of Ruy Lopez} 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. O-O Nxe4 5. d4 Be7 6. Re1 Nd6 7. Ba4 exd4 *

[Event "Viewer Submitted Openings Bonus 9"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2005.08.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "?"]
[Black "?"]
[Result "*"]
[ECO "A45"]
[PlyCount "17"]
[EventDate "2005.??.??"]

{Occyroexanthub: Stupid engines can't really play with black good here so let's see.} 1. d4 Nf6 2. Bg5 c5 3. d5 Qb6 4. Nc3 Qxb2 5. Bd2 Qb6 6. e4 e5 7. f4 d6 8. Nf3
Nbd7 9. a4 *

[Event "Viewer Submitted Openings Bonus 9"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2005.08.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "?"]
[Black "?"]
[Result "*"]
[ECO "E90"]
[PlyCount "31"]
[EventDate "2005.??.??"]

{Occyroexanthub: Black has to play with a Rook down but with strong compensation. White should not really try to keep the Knight.} 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 g6 3. c4 Bg7 4. Nc3 O-O 5. e4 d6 6. Be3 c6 7. Be2 Qc7 8. O-O e5 9. d5 c5 10. Nd2 h6 11. b4 cxb4 12. Nb5 Qe7 13. c5 dxc5 14. d6 Qd8 15. Nc7 Qxd6 16. Nxa8 *